Teacher
View Resource
  • Number of visits 255
  • Number of saves 50
  • 9

Description

Overview:
This lesson plan centers on a fun, interactive activity that allows students to explore and understand common English idioms.
Subject:
Language Education (ESL), English Language Arts
Level:
Middle School, High School, Adult Education
Material Type:
Activity/Lab
Author:
Date Added:
04/06/2015
License:
Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial
Language:
English
Media Format:
Text/HTML

Comments

Joanna Stratman
on Apr 06, 03:22pm Evaluation

CCSS.ELA-Literacy.L.6.1: Strong (2)

Students need a firm grasp of the language in order to explain what they think their idiom means. With the exception of the independent work, students needs to be able to express themselves to their group in order to be understood.

Joanna Stratman
on Apr 06, 03:22pm Evaluation

CCSS.ELA-Literacy.SL.6.1: Superior (3)

This was given a "3" because students are directed to explain their idioms clearly to two different groups of classmates.It is an integral part of the lesson.

Joanna Stratman
on Apr 06, 03:22pm Evaluation

CCSS.ELA-Literacy.L.6.4: Strong (2)

Looking up their idioms in the dictionary is a minor, but important, part of the lesson.

Joanna Stratman
on Apr 06, 03:22pm Evaluation

Quality of Explanation of the Subject Matter: Strong (2)

This is rated a "2" because the lesson could use a quick introduction on what idioms are. If students are exposed to them in English for the first time, it would be beneficial to use one as an example so students can understand the concept before having to explain the idioms to other students.

Joanna Stratman
on Apr 06, 03:22pm Evaluation

Utility of Materials Designed to Support Teaching: Strong (2)

The lesson is rated a "2" for reason 1 - it does not include suggestions to use the materials with a variety of learners. Also, it could have used a note sheet for students to organize the different meanings of idioms as their classmates are explaining them.

Joanna Stratman
on Apr 06, 03:22pm Evaluation

Quality of Assessments: Limited (1)

While there is a "closure" section, this lesson receives a "1" for assessment because it does not assess the understanding of each individual student. It addresses some of the performance expectations, but does so as a group so there would be no way to know if each group member is nearing proficiency.

Joanna Stratman
on Apr 06, 03:22pm Evaluation

Quality of Technological Interactivity: Not Applicable (N/A)

This has been rated "N/A" because there isn't any technology involved in this lesson plan. However, it would be very easy to integrate technology. For instance, students could access a computer or iPad to check dictionaries, or apps like NearPod could be used to present the lesson (which is what we did).

Joanna Stratman
on Apr 06, 03:22pm Evaluation

Quality of Instructional and Practice Exercises: Strong (2)

The lesson receives a "2" here, because the activities are strong but only somewhat varied (two of the main activities involve students explain their idioms to different groups). However, this would be a great introductory activity to any idioms. Teachers would need to follow up in subsequent classes to cement understanding.

Joanna Stratman
on Apr 06, 03:22pm Evaluation

Opportunities for Deeper Learning: Superior (3)

This lesson receives a "3" because there are many opportunities for deeper learning. Students are thinking critically (to define their idioms and to agree/disagree with classmates), working collaboratively, communicating effectively, constructing viable "arguments" (their explanation of their idiom), and applying knowledge to real word situations (students may have to come up with a few examples to further illustrate what their idiom means to classmates who are not sure).

Standards

Evaluations

Achieve OER

Average Score (3 Points Possible)
Degree of Alignment2.3 (2 users)
Quality of Explanation of the Subject Matter2 (3 users)
Utility of Materials Designed to Support Teaching2.3 (3 users)
Quality of Assessments2.3 (3 users)
Quality of Technological Interactivity1 (1 user)
Quality of Instructional and Practice Exercises2.3 (3 users)
Opportunities for Deeper Learning2.7 (3 users)

Tags (5)